Thursday, August 14, 2014

Guiding quotes for the 2014-15 school year:

"The teacher is of course an artist, but being an artist does not mean that he or she can make the profile, can shape the students. What the educator does in teaching is to make it possible for the students to become themselves."
-Paolo Friere

"Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace- not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth."
-James Baldwin, The Fire Next Time

"Freedom is what we do with what is done to us."
-Jean-Paul Sartre

"Never forget that justice is what love looks like in public"
-Cornel West

"You can't lead the people if you don't love the people. You can't save the people if you don't serve the people."
-Cornel West

"Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons or property will be safe."
-Frederick Douglass


Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The One-Eyed King and Holden Caulfield

The One-Eyed King and Holden Caulfield
 Read with Sister Spit Next Generation Tour at Hugo House in Seattle, WA: March 2014

A professor I once had in grad. school went off about the old saw: “In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.”  They pointed out how offensive it was, and connected it to colonialism and racism. Their basic premise being that the blind don’t need some one-eyed asshole to lead them.  That exploitation was in the fabric of the thing.  To truly lead the blind toward their revolution, the one-eyed king would need to put out his sighted eye and really join the team.  I sat with this (I really enjoy an extended metaphor) and toyed with it, and ultimately thought, “Oh yeah, this is familiar.  I know all about being a one-eyed king of a fascist state.  I am one.” 

Every teacher is a one-eyed king of a blind kingdom.  We have a little more information than those we rule over.  We have outsider status.  We are resented and feared for the privilege that adulthood and the power of the system bestows upon us.  And an astonishing 83% of us are white and in the way of whites, I assume that most of that 83% are pretty deep in the privilege. Note that I do not style the teacher as a fully sighted king.  We understand the ways of our subjects, but it is a hazy understanding.  Close your eyes and picture yourself at fourteen.  Now, how do you feel about being fourteen?  For me it’s kind of a murky sense of anxiety and dissatisfaction.  I don’t really remember it.  I certainly don’t really know what it is like to be a 14-year-old person of color, regardless of sex. I do however, know this: The reality of 14 year olds is that they are all somewhat sociopathic.  Truthfully.  They are incredibly obtuse in most ways, intensely vulnerable due to that lack of knowledge and experience and outrageously self-involved.  Some of them are insecure bullies and almost all of them are anxious raw nerves walking around under the heady influence of an almost unbearable amount of hormones.  Throw a single adult into a room of thirty of these developing humans and some interesting things happen.  Daily insurrection, chronic rebellion and occasionally, that thing of rare and incredible beauty: learning.

Generally speaking, I hated my teachers.  There were a few who escaped my total wrath and one that I was madly in love with (in second grade) but for the most part, I hated their guts.  They were despots.  They abused power.  Some of them were sexist, many racist, most classist and homophobic. They were clueless about what actually interested us.  They assigned stupid work.  They were horrible people sent to torment children.  And what’s more, they enjoyed the torment.  It was clear.  Why else would they be teachers?  They were old sickos who got off on tyrannizing the young.  Nothing they wanted me to do was worth doing. No book they ever assigned was worth reading. The Catcher in the Rye?  What a piece of shit.  Are you kidding me?  You think that this self-involved, upper-class jerk has anything to say to me?  You think he resembles my experience at all?  Fuck you.  You don’t know me.  It was my 11th grade English teacher who assigned The Catcher in the Rye that gave me the teacher curse.  I remember her saying that I should “be a teacher” after I took my bitter tongue to Holden Caulfield’s class privilege one day. I’m sure I shuddered at the thought. 

So, I just started teaching The Catcher in the Rye to my 10th graders a month ago.   Hilarious, isn’t it?  I would love to tell you the story of how I became a teacher, but I’m still working it out, so you’ll just have to make the leap for now.   The road from despising both teachers and Holden Caulfield to being a teacher who teaches J. D. Salinger was rocky and winding and strange. But now I’m here.  Or rather, I’m there.  At the front of the room.   I’m not a total sellout okay?  Holden Caulfield still is a classist asshole and it is still a ridiculously chauvinistic book in a disgustingly white and male canon.  I try to teach at the fringes of that canon as much as possible.  My Freshies, for instance, are reading I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings and we have regular awesome, intense and sometimes uncomfortable conversations about Jim Crow, white supremacy, misogyny and rape.  As a teacher, I’m all in.

 So what led me from Octavia Butler, Maya Angelou, Gary Soto, Sherman Alexie and James Baldwin to J. D. Salinger?  Excellent question.  It started with other teachers that I admired.  They just kept teaching the fucking thing.  I’d ask “why?” they’d say it was great, I’d roll my eyes, and so on.  After one brilliant teacher at my first high school told me how it was most often the book her students said was their favorite, I asked her to tell me how she taught it.  It was complex and brilliant, starting with background on the cold war and the social restrictions of the ‘50s and the fear of juvenile delinquency.  Her guiding questions for the unit was: How is adolescence a kind of apocalypse?  Okay, I was finally hooked, so I read it.  I would say “again,” but I’m not sure I actually read more than the first chapter or two back in 1991.  I read it in a few days over Winter Break and it made me laugh out loud.  It made me roll my eyes, and it sure as hell reminded me of teenagers.  I realized that this book was like them in a way that they might not want to see, that I hadn’t wanted to see when I was one of them.  And sure, it was about a privileged white male in the 1950s, but it was also about every single one of my students (not one of them a privileged white male).  I still didn’t teach it.  Honestly, I felt like it had taken me two decades to appreciate it, I wasn’t in a hurry to try and teach it.  

The next year, I changed schools and met one of the prickliest teenagers I have ever known at my new high school in San Francisco.  I took over an Advisory class of sophomores after their former teacher got fired for disagreeing with the new principal.  Not a good start.  I was generally reviled and mistrusted by all.  But there was one student who hated me more and trusted me less than I had ever experienced before (or since).  Yesinia was the sort of kid who would cuss a teacher out for asking her to please sit down or to take out her pencil.  She would also cuss out other students, the principal, the assistant principal and campus security.  In a nutshell, she just didn’t give a fuck.  She told me that she “didn’t trust adults” and that “adults were all phony assholes” during the first week I knew her.  She also told me to fuck off and walked out of class twice, in the first week I knew her.  One thing about Yesinia though, was that she was a reader.  It’s a rare thing in this day and age.  A rare and beautiful thing. 

One of my introductions to teaching Advisory was something that I privately called “Teacher Torture” but that the school called SSR (Sustained Silent Reading) and that I had to teach an hour of a week.   Trying to get 20 students who hated my guts (and most of whom hated books) to read was an insanely hard task.  I spent most of my time dragging in new books in an attempt to entice them, initially from our sad basement library, but increasingly from one of the plentiful used bookstores by my house in Berkeley.  Early on, I tried out a couple mopey, romantic YA novels on Yesinia.  They were probably about vampires.  She looked at them askance and said, “I don’t read that crap, don't you have anything by J.D. Salinger?”  I must have looked surprised, which she read as stupid, because she then said, “he wrote The Catcher in the Rye”, in a tone that implied I was an illiterate moron.  “Oh yes, I know,” I managed to say, and then I managed, “He didn’t write much else, but I’ll try to find you something.”  I went to the used bookstore that very evening and scored an extremely dog-eared copy of Franny and Zooey for $3.50.  I handed it to my grumpy little hater the next morning in Advisory.  “I found you some Salinger,” I said, feeling smooth. She looked at me in disbelief, reconciling her concept of me as a phony-asshole-adult and the fact that I had clearly just responded to an offhand request like a genie in a bottle.  She snatched it from me and read it feverishly all during Advisory, asking, "Can I take this?" after class.  "Please!", I said. The next day after school she appeared by my desk.  “Hi there,” I said and she glared back.  She had the book in her hands.  “What did you think?” I asked.  She looked at me hard and then sat down on the edge of my desk.  “It’s not that good,” she said.  “Oh,” I said.  “Why not?”  “Well, they just aren’t that interesting, not like Holden.”  So I asked her about Holden.  A huge part of me feeling extremely confused about how a 15-year-old Mexican girl, with a discipline file as thick as a phonebook, growing up on welfare in a gentrified Mission district, could relate to Holden Caulfield.  She told me.  “The fake-ass adults who pretend they are there to help.”  Those prep school teachers, the creepy psychiatrist, the condescending adults everywhere in Catcher, they were in her world too: “Teachers (with an evil eye on me), Social Workers, Therapists.  None of them could be trusted and they were all out to fuck you over.   I nodded along.  “I hated teachers too, “ I told her.  She looked at me like I was either crazy or a liar.  

I was Yesinia’s English teacher her 11th grade year and we read what, in my estimation, were some great books: Bless Me, Ultima, Kindred and The Things They Carried.  But, every time I’d hand one out, she’d sigh and tell me it wouldn’t be as good as Catcher. 

When I moved to Washington and began at my new school, I was almost knocked flat by the book list.  It was rotten.  Okay, it had some good books, but (to just give you an idea) a listed key 9th grade text was Ethan Frome.  Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against Edith Wharton, but I am not in a hurry to teach her to my 9th graders.  There was so little of what I’d been teaching, all the go-to books for the culturally sensitive, activist white teachers of young brown people.  I spent a week looking despairingly over the list, just thumbing through the file over and over.  Of course it had Catcher.  “Of course it does,” I said.  Of course.  But I was scared to teach it.  Finally, I accepted the lack of options and put it on my 10th grade syllabus.  I located the 30 battered copies in the back corner of the book room (even though the computer said we had 100) and girded my loins.  I called in all my old friends, emailing about that “adolescence as apocalypse” stuff and what kind of essays did you do? and how did you handle the really dated 50’s stuff? and how do you talk about its problematic whiteness?, and all that.  Okay.  I thought of Yesinia, who now in her senior year in SF, occasionally sends me long Facebook messages about how much she hates her life.  I never get to hear about the good stuff and I send her back short but profuse messages about how amazing and brilliant she is and how much better it is to be an adult than a teenager.  I think of Yesinia every day as we read aloud in class.  I’ve really got a good patter down now, when I read Holden.  All those goddams and chrissakes and irritatingly sarcastic “reallys”.  And the students, mostly, are pretty into it.  Sometimes they accuse one another of acting like Holden when they are being bitchy, which is funny and sometimes they get disgusted by him, but generally they appreciate him and ride his self-centered complaining and see what he’s really saying.  That growing up is horrible and that no adult can ever understand you.  It doesn’t matter that they “went through it themselves”; it doesn’t matter at all.  They are all stupid, one-eyed kings, lording it over you.  Shadenfreuding their way through your pain and agony.  Laughing at you, lecturing you.  Assholes. 

It’s horrible.  Holden was right.  Yesinia too.  And Ida, back in 1991.  She was right too, even if she missed the boat on Catcher.  Adolescence is an apocalypse. 

Monday, March 7, 2011

new class/ spring semester


Reflection 1 of Spring Semester and of my new classroom.
“Welcome to the wonderful world of your spring 9th grade English Class, taught by me, Ms. Acton.” 
Okay, that one still needs a little work.  I’m ready though, with a bunch of icebreakers, a first unit that’s mostly ironed out, 4 days planned for getting to know each other and a strategy to lock one of the doors to my classroom and barricade the other with all the impressive physical mass I can muster in order to shake every hand - every day.  
I have just moments more.  
The ball drops and the curtains go up on Feb. 1, next Tuesday.  I’m ready and also, I’m not.  Hello Teaching!  Last semester, AC and DM who have been teaching at the HS for 16 and 22 years respectively, told me that they still have that anxiety dream where you are up in front of the class and suddenly realize that you have nothing prepared.  Man, I’ve been having that dream A LOT lately.  Yow. 
Since I have been forewarned and instructed that this semester is going to be insane while I’m getting my PACT (Performance Assessment for California Teachers -for those not yet in the acronym know) done, I’m going to follow the advice of my seminar teacher and use PACT specific prompts for all of these weekly reflections until my PACT is done on 4/14/2011.  For those of you who are not my supervisor, and probably for you too Kate, it may render these a little dry. 

PROMPT: What do you see experienced teachers struggling with at your school? What can you learn from this?
This seemed like a good start in order to introduce the concept that I am seeing a lot of experienced-teacher-struggle right now in my new CT, JW.  I took this placement in another small school at the HS) with the 9th graders because it was very strongly suggested to me that AHA would like to hire me for next year to be their 9th/11th grade English teacher.  I knew that it was going to be a challenging spring placement and that I would be required to do more work than the average student teacher.  So, I know, I knew, and I only have myself to blame, and hopefully I will be getting a great job out of the bargain.  So these are some things I have generally seen some really great teachers struggling with are:

1. Staying present
2. Not getting complacent about teaching
3. Really getting to know your students
4. Not getting overwhelmed by the responsibilities of the job

And I guess right now the biggest thing that I can learn from all of those and this also applies specifically to my relationship with JW, is that teaching is an incredibly hard job to do well.  Being kind to yourself, your students and your fellow educators while trying to stay present, do your best work and maintain boundaries is a tall order.  I think it can be a real pitfall for a new teacher, hot off the presses and bursting with excitement about educational equity and new ideas, to judge veteran teachers for their current relationships with their jobs.  Yes, it is important to know what we believe and to recognize patterns that we don’t want to fall into and attitudes that we don’t want to reflect in our own teaching, but it is also incredibly important to recognize the humanity in every educator.  The ability to be critical without stripping another person of their humanity or villanizing them is a very important adult skill.  I think it is one I have struggled to maintain in the midst of this program.  It can be very easy to give in to bad-mouthing teachers we perceive as “bad” or “unfit” and I think that there is
a way that in groups it can be very easy to give in to that lowest-common-denominator urge to shit-talk.  So, as far as my situation goes right now, I’m resisting the urge.  I’m respecting JW’s humanity and the choice that he made to be an educator and believing that he has skills and ideas to share with me, and that there are things I can learn from him.  Okay, I know I really just scratched the surface of those 4 things, but I fell myself and my brain winding down and I’m starting to make a lot of typos… so, good night.

teaching persona

Reflection 2 of Semester 2:

This is going to be short and sweet sour.  It has been one hell of a week.  I’ve almost made it entirely through.  It’s better than when it began.  Failure is a valid outcome of effort; in fact, failure proves effort.  Try more = fail more, which ultimately means fail less.  This is what I’m thinking right now.  So, on to my prompt…

“How are you developing your teaching persona? Who is emerging? How has this changed as you have changed classrooms?”

I was originally puzzled by the idea of a teaching persona.  I’m not much of one for personas in general.  I’m sort of a take-it-or-leave-it guy.  Case in point, I find that if I dress up “too professionally” for teaching (say anything more dressy than a cotton sweater or shirt with buttons) I feel so uncomfortable and unlike myself that I find it much harder to teach.  So, I thought teaching personas might be great for some but would clearly not be for me.  Not so.  I’ve recently realized that I do, in fact have a teaching persona.  It is very similar to my actual person, except that it’s more, well, adult.  Sort of an uber-me, who is always fair and sees everything that’s happening and does not hesitate to say whether something is acceptable or not, and is never sarcastic, even when being blatantly insulted.  I like it.  It is a version of myself that has a distinct gravitas.  I didn’t have it last semester.  Maybe because I hadn’t found it yet, maybe because my students were Seniors, maybe because I didn’t need it as much with such a strong CT as AC was…  But now that I’m in the land of Freshmen I am really glad to find this more serious and grounded and thick-skinned self. 

Also, I accidentally came out to my class on Wednesday.  I say accidentally because that wasn’t how I had planned to do it…  I misheard K. say “B. is gay.”  She swears up and down that she actually said “B, yay!”  I believe her, why not?  But I had said to myself that at the first pejorative use of the word gay, I would make a definitive statement about how I felt about that usage.  So, I did.  I said (and really it just kind of came-out) “I’m not okay with the use of the word gay in a pejorative or negative way in my class, in case you hadn’t noticed, I’m gay.” Then K. said, “I didn’t say gay” and she explained and I said okay, but I’m still not okay with it.  And then E. (a perpetual sarcastic comment maker) said, “that’s awkward”.  There were a bunch of titters, and I said, “Let me make myself very clear E., and everybody, I do not feel awkward about being gay.”  To which D and Ka. and Kh all shrieked and said, “oh, she told you!” or something like that.  And then we talked about it for a little bit, some of them said they had not noticed that I was gay and were surprised and we defined “pejorative” and discussed different usages of words and I felt very lucky to teach in Berkeley. 

I’m off to dream of quizzes and graphic organizers… 

Jack of All Trades... Master of None

"I do not strain at the position- /It is familiar- but at the author's drift; /Who, in his circumstance, expressly proves/ That no man is the lord of anything,-/ Though in and of him there be much consisting-/ Till he communicate his parts to others."  -Shakespeare from Troilus and Cressida ( a convo. between Ulysses and Achilles, this is Ulysses speaking) 
Oh, thank you David Hawkins (in your article that I had to, but had no time to, read for Anna's class this week) for that lovely quote. It rang so true for me and my struggles this year. As many of you probably know, my partner Devon is getting her MFT, and she often tells me that therapy school makes her feel crazy. To this I frequently retort, "and teacher school makes you feel dumb". It's true, at least for me. There must be something to it then, as Ulysses says "no man is the lord of anything... till he communicate his parts to others". There is the old adage that many members of my family quote frequently, either in reference to themselves or to other family members, "Jack of all trades, Master of none". It serves as a poke at our relentless and restless needs to change careers and hobbies as soon as we gain a working knowledge and basic skill-set. I know a little about a lot, it's true. The subject matter knowledge as well as the confidence in both that knowledge and my skill as a teacher that seem to be necessary to teach well do at times, escape me. I love the idea of empowering the student. It strikes me as my true purpose in teaching to propose new systems and information and facilitate interest and growth. Not always sure HOW to do this, but I definitely see the straight and narrow road (often from the ditch off to the side) of teacher as facilitator. In the article there is a long story about the author searching desperately to find a common interest in order to gain the trust of children, and it rang true even to my experience of the adolescents in my 9th grade class. Although it seems to me that it is far harder for the adult to feign interest and be believed by an adolescent than a young-child. So, I must always try to find some way to identify with and relate to the material I am teaching. When I read a passage in the book we are reading that I find particularly interesting, or that I believe is a very appealing example of figurative language, I always get their attention. So back to the real.  Always that.  Are you distracted and anxious?; then that's what you teach.  Are you bored and thinking of something else?; then that's what you teach.  Authenticity and knowledge coupled with the desire to facilitate interest, learning, and growth, that's what we need. A sturdy box of all kinds of tools and a wide array of interests do come in handy after all... "jack of all trades, master of knowledge"... perhaps?

I'll leave you with an exciting quote from the other article I limped through this week by M. S. Friedman: "It is also impossible to safeguard the student by any distinctions in content, such as what is 'progressive' and what is 'reactionary,' what is 'patriotic' and what is 'subversive,' what is in the spirit of science and what is not. These are in essence distinctions between the propaganda of which one approves and the propaganda of which one disapproves." HEY! 

equity and concessions

Back to the prompts: 
"Describe a moment in your classroom that filled you either with hope or despair when thinking about issues of equity"

Well, I have this big burning question that relates pretty solidly to equity.  "Am I helping my students when I make concessions, chase students down for work, give extensions, and sometimes even hand-hold through the work process?"  The truth is that when it comes down to it, I do these things for my special ed. students (which is fine, appropriate, and even mandated) and then I also do it for my lower-achieving students who are almost all students of color (as are most of my special ed. students...).  So here is the equity question.  Now I'll lead you through the "moment" and my pondering.

I have this student T.  I love T.  Let me just say that first off.  T is the only African-American male in my 2nd period English class (There are only 8 male students in total).  He is one of the oddest, most spaced out kids I have ever met.  He has a very bizarre sense of humor and is one of the most even tempered teenagers I have ever met.  Essentially, he is a checked-out Buddha.  He is clearly brilliant, but not a very successful student.  So, I started going after him.  I want your work.  I want your work.  I want your work.  And, much like with D and J (my two African-American seniors that I harassed out of flunking Fall semester) it started to work.  T is most definitely not the only kid in my class I am doing this with.  Several other students have benefitted from my chasing them down and haranguing them for work.  But with T, I took it to a new level.  Let me also add here that T is a student who I really believe needs an IEP or at the very least a 504 plan.  His checked out stuff is for real and he has a very very hard time concentrating or remembering what is said in class even when he appears to be listening.  So, here is the new level.  When his rough draft persuasive letter was 4 days late (it was the second Final Draft typing day for the class) I sat him down next to my desk, and refused to let him leave until he wrote it.  I literally coached each successive paragraph out of him.  It was like pulling teeth and I definitely neglected my other students in the process.  Then I stayed for lunch the next day (so not convenient for me and not my normal day to stay for lunch) because he had promised to come in to type his final draft (he doesn't have computer access at home and I was afraid that if his only option was the library, he just wouldn't do it.)  So, he stood me up, which made me cranky.  I left him a note that said Ms. Erby will let you type it in her room, but he never came down to see it.  So when he strolled into class on Friday, I took the note off the door where I had left it and handed it to him.  He was super apologetic, "Ms. Acton, I forgot.  Can I do it today?"  Well, Friday is my normal day to stay for lunch for quiz makeups, etc... so I said yes.  He then taped the note I left him the day before to his shirt and wore it for the rest of class. Completely cracked me up, of course. So, lunch came around and he showed up!  Wow!  He typed up his letter and emailed it to me. As he was beginning, I rifled through his folder and found another assignment for class he had completed (perfectly) and never turned in.  T!  This was worth 10 points!  He smiled sheepishly at me, and said "oh."  good grief!

So here are my thoughts about equity and the situation with T.  Am I helping or hurting?  I mean, obviously in some ways I'm helping. T will get a better grade now, but he's also pretty dependent on me for the trend to continue.  If I stop giving him extra time and help, he will most likely stop doing well in my class.  With another student I've been giving extra attention to, K, it's not like that, I chased her down, showed her that I cared and valued her and she started doing work, I have to remind her for sure, but not hold her hand.  Is hand-holding good?  It's clearly not a solution because I can't help T. in every class for the next 4 years.  So, what should I do?  I hate to see a kid flounder and that's exactly what T. was doing before I intervened.  What should I do now?  Am I being paternalistic in offering this type of assistance to students of color?  I wouldn't consider offering it to most of the white students in my class, but then that's also because none of the white students in my class are in T's (or even K's) boat.  Am I evening the playing field?  Do the short-term effects outweigh the fact that I am not achieving long-range self-reliance for T?  Oh my brain is starting to hurt.  Enough of this for now.